ICC underlines impartiality, reiterates commitment to cooperation with the African Union

The International criminal court has hit back to the unanimous decision by the African Union Heads of States of having the cases facing three Kenyans be transferred back home.  The Presidency of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on May 29 issued statement in light of reports on discussions concerning the ICC at the recent Summit of the African Union held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The presidency echoed that that it recognizes the effort by the African Union and said the ICC judicial process is in the interest of impartial judicial process.

“The International Criminal Court acknowledges and respects the African Union’s important role as the continent’s main regional organization. As an impartial international judicial institution, the ICC, including its independent Office of the Prosecutor, strives to maintain good working relationships with all relevant international and regional bodies, including the African Union.”

The court farther reminded Kenya that the cases before the court were referral cases and the court would act within its legal frame work to ensure justice is served to all.

“The ICC’s relationship with Africa is all the more important considering that 34 African countries are States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC. In addition, the majority of the Court’s current investigations were initiated following referrals or requests from the African States in question.”

“The ICC operates strictly within the mandate and legal framework created by the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the Court, and cannot take political factors into account. Decisions are taken independently on the basis of the law and the available evidence and are not based on regional or ethnic considerations. Judges are the guarantors of the fairness of proceedings before the Court, from the authorization of investigations to the confirmation or non-confirmation of charges and decisions on guilt or innocence.”

The court farther underlined that justice was in two ways and not one way as the African Union Heads of states put.

“It must be recalled that cases before the ICC are not only about the suspects or the accused; they also concern the thousands of victims affected by the events under the ICC’s jurisdiction, many of whom are represented in the various proceedings with the help of legal assistance provided by the Court.”

“The ICC does not replace national jurisdictions; it only complements them when necessary. The Rome Statute defines the criteria for deciding whether cases should be tried before the ICC or in a national judicial system, and this determination is made through a judicial process by independent judges of the ICC. In all proceedings before the ICC, suspects as well as concerned States have the possibility to address these matters in accordance with the Rome Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.”

The court farther told the African Heads of states that only the UN Security Council had the powers to defer or refer cases as governed by the UN Charter.

“While the Rome Statute gives the United Nations (UN) Security Council powers of referral and deferral in relation to the ICC, the exercise of these powers by the Security Council is governed by the UN Charter. The ICC is autonomous from the United Nations and does not participate in the Security Council’s decision-making. However once the Security Council refers a situation to the ICC, the investigation and proceedings that may arise from that situation are governed by the Rome Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICC and are not influenced by the Security Council or any other external body.”

The court cleared air that the process is itself independent and cant not be manipulated by anyone as alleged by the African Heads of States in the 50th Anniversary of the African Union in Addis Ababa in Ethiopia.

“The Presidency stresses that the ICC is an independent institution that has a specific, judicial mandate created by States determined to end impunity and to contribute to the prevention of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The ICC counts on the continued support and cooperation of its States Parties in accordance with the Rome Statute and remains fully committed to a constructive and cooperative relationship with the African Union.”

On the same issue, Former Premier Raila Odinga faulted the decision by the African Heads of state to politicize the cases before the international court saying African took itself to ICC and not the vice versa. Odinga Reminded Kenyans that the parliament rejected the bill to have a local tribunal paving way for the ICC judicial process which is now out of hand for President Uhuru Kenyatta and His Deputy William Samoei Ruto and a Radio Journalist Joshua Arap Sang.

Its time Kenya accepts that the cases are before the international criminal court and cooperate if the suspects are sure they are innocent however politicizing the matter would be a subject that needs to be discussed later.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why We Need Advocacy Journalism in Africa

Image
                                                                                                   Tweet When one mentions the term journalism, some wonder what that actually means. Is it the content that makes you a journalist? Is it your take on the contemporary issues that guarantees you to be referred to as ‘Journalist’? Well I refresh my mind back in 2006. By then I was in Form 2 in Machakos school, I bet it is still the best school in Eastern Province. The politics, constitutionalism and regional integration filled the air… as a young man of 16 years I could not make out what that actually meant for us, and by the ‘us’ I mean the so-called future leaders. Felix Kilonzo- Mku studios I dropped the idea of pursuing the Bio-Che...
Read more

Uhuru Kenyatta Cant Implement Land Reforms

Image
President Kenyatta Due to public demand, Felix Kilonzo will for the first time break the silence over the TJRC report that was released by the commission to unmask the historical injustices that has affected the country since 1963. Although my silence adversely comes about due to the report’s sensitivity and its tall orders and revisiting what I call the land reforms which I term as a mere joke of our time. The report in paragraph 199 says “During Kenyatta’s administration at independence and for several years thereafter, illegal dealings in land which left many individuals, families and communities landless and land-scarce took many forms.” The intro to the land alienation that existed after the independence that my grandparents fought for indiscriminately was confirmed that the 90% of Kenya is managed by 5% of Kenyans and not through transparent forms but through ill gotten wealth and abuse of office. The report says, “They [Kenyatta administration] included outright land...
Read more

Parties have hard options as parties in CORD have 1 day to go

Parties within the coalition on reforms and democracy and those affiliated to the Jubilee coalitions are expected to conduct the primaries on Thursday in compliance with the parties act. In the lower eastern province Wiper Democratic Movement allied politicians have intensified their own campaigns to woo party members to vote for them in the coming party nomination. In Machakos Town in Machakos County, the gubernatorial position has attracted 2 major candidates who are former government officials. Former Water Minister, Mutua Katuku will face it off with former government spokesman Dr. Alfred Mutua in the wiper democratic movement. In the women representative MP, Maendeleo ya wanawake chairlady Mary Mutinga will face it off with a Machakos based medical doctor Dr. Susan Musyoka for the wiper ticket. Dr. Musyoka tried to vie for the Machakos Town constituency seat but came a distance 5 th and now she is set to battle it out with Mary Mutinga for the newly created Women represe...
Read more